Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Phillips v. Industrial MacHine

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1999No. S-97-1263Published

1ConcurrenceGerrard, J.

I concur in the majority’s determination that the district court’s order granting a new trial should be affirmed. I write separately, however, because the time has come to reexamine our analytical framework for the evaluation of expert opinion testimony.

INTRODUCTION

Judge Learned Hand observed nearly a century ago that “[n]o one will deny that the law should in some way effectively use expert knowledge wherever it will aid in settling disputes. The only question is as to how it can do so best.” Learned Hand, Historical and Practical Considerations Regarding Expert Testimony, 15 Harv. L. Rev.…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API