Legal Opinion

Young v. Oury

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 2013No. 26182PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In this medical malpractice case, the jury returned a verdict for defendant doctor. Plaintiff appeals, asserting circuit court error in improperly admitting evidence, precluding relevant evidence, refusing a jury instruction, and prejudicially commenting on the case in the presence of the jury.

Background

[¶ 2.] While being treated for a cancerous tumor in her kidney in 2007, Kathy Young was diagnosed with a diseased aortic valve. She consulted Dr. K. John Heil-man of the Heart Doctor’s Clinic in Spearñsh, South Dakota. Dr. Heilman recommended “eatherization and valve…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Verdicchio v. RiccaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  3. State v. WinterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kuper v. Lincoln-Union Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DelehoySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. DelehoySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Center of Life Church v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Casper Lodging, LLC v. AkersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Jensen v. Menard, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API