Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Lockwood Oil Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This case comes before us on a second appeal. Most of the facts now involved are stated in Thomas v. Lockwood Oil Co. 174 Wis. 486, 182 N. W. 841, and in that statement is included a map showing the location of ■streets and the place of the accident mentioned in the testimony. It is therefore unnecessary to repeat the facts contained in the statement there made.

*602On the former trial the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant on the ground that the person in charge of the car of defendant was not at the time of the accident in the scope of his employment. On the second' trial, by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matuschka v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Thomas v. Lockwood Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Strehlau v. John Schroeder Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. McGonegle v. Wisconsin Gas & Electric Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. West v. Bayfield Mill Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. MatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Lane v. HatfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Griffin v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. MatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API