Legal Opinion

McGonegle v. Wisconsin Gas & Electric Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

The only question raised upon this appeal is whether the $1,000 awarded for pecuniary benefits the parents might reasonably expect from their child after he attained the age of twenty-one years has any foundation in the evidence. The total amount of damages awarded for the loss of the child’s services was $1,500. This is not excessive when compared with other verdicts which have been sustained. Thus, in Ewen v. C. & N. W. R. Co. 38 Wis. 613, a $2,500 verdict for the death of a nine-year-old son was sustained. In Strong v. Stevens Point, 62 Wis. 255, 22 N. W. 425, a $1,200 verdict for the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ihl v. Forty-Second Street & Grand Street Ferry RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Ewen v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Potter v. Chicago & North-Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Potter v. Chicago & Northwestern RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Johnson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Peot v. FerraroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. D'Angelo v. Rutland Railway Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  3. Keasler v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Costello v. SchultWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Vande Hei v. Vande HeiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API