Legal Opinion

Horizon Savings v. Wootton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1991No. 1960PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillin, Presiding Judge.

Defendants-appellants, Faye and Arthur Wootton, appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Horizon Savings (“Horizon”), in Horizon’s action asserting a deficiency judgment against the Woottons. We reverse.

The Woottons received a loan from Horizon in order to purchase a 1987 Oldsmobile 98 Regency automobile. As a condition of the loan, the Woottons gave Horizon a security interest in the automobile until the loan was paid in full.

Horizon repossessed the automobile when the Woottons failed to make timely payments on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Clark Leasing Corp. v. White Sands Forest Products, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  3. First National Bank of Bellevue v. RoseNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Liberty National Bank v. GreinerOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. First National Bank of New Bremen v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. B.F. Goodrich Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Kruse v. Voyager Insurance CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. National City Bank v. Plechaty CompaniesOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Huntington National Bank v. Legard, Unpublished Decision (1-28-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Columbus Mtge., Inc. v. Morton, 06ap-723 (6-19-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API