State Of Washington, Respondent/cross-appellant v. Daryl C. Rogers, Ii, Appellant/cross-respondent

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 81396-0-I ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) DARYL ROGERS, a/k/a ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION DARYL CRAIG ROGERS, ) ) Appellant. ) ) VERELLEN, J. — Daryl Rogers contends multiple errors prevented him from enjoying a fair trial. Because the record does not support his contentions, we affirm Rogers’ conviction. The court did not abuse its discretion by denying Rogers’ motion for mistrial because the improper testimony mentioning his past juvenile detention was fleeting and immediately dismissed as “irrelevant” by the…