Legal Opinion
Chill v. General Electric Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 27, 1996No. 1534, Docket 95-9175PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Daniel Chill and appellants (collectively, the “plaintiffs”) appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Keenan, J.) dismissing the complaint and denying plaintiffs leave to amend. The district court found that plaintiffs failed to allege facts that supported their claim that defendant-appellee General Electric Company (“GE”) committed securities fraud in reporting the false profits generated by a bond trader at its subsidiary, Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. (“Kidder”). For the reasons that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Acito v. IMCERA Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- San Leandro Emergency Medical Group Profit Sharing Plan v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- In Re Time Warner Inc. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Rothman v. GregorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Paul Stevelman, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Alias Research Inc. And Stephen R.B. BinghamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Kalnit v. EichlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Kalnit v. EichlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- South Cherry Street, LLC v. Hennessee Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.