Douthitt v. Finch
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
This appeal presents only a question of costs.
*215Before the trial, and after plaintiff had incurred and paid twenty-six dollars costs, the defendant regularly served upon the plaintiff an offer in writing to allow judgment to be taken for five hundred dollars, which was not accepted. Upon the trial the plaintiff recovered only four hundred dollars. The court allowed the plaintiff’s cost-bill for the twenty-six dollars, incurred before the offer of defendant to allow judgment for five hundred dollars, but charged plaintiff with costs after that offer. The appellant contends that no…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Basler v. Sacramento Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Brown v. NolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Harvard Investment Co. v. Gap Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Bennett v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.