Legal Opinion
City of Dallas v. Saucedo-Falls
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided September 30, 2005No. 05-04-01368-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice LANG-MIERS.
This is an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s denial of the City of Dallas’s plea to the jurisdiction. The City contends that the trial court (1) erred in denying its plea to the jurisdiction and (2) abused its discretion in excluding two of the City’s exhibits. We affirm the trial court’s order denying the City’s plea to the jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
Eleven police officers (“plaintiff employees”), including eight deputy chiefs and three assistant chiefs, sued the City because they did not get a pay raise they contend they were promised by the City. 1…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- County of Cameron v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MaloneTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Dallas v. Saucedo-Falls, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
- DeQuire v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- City of Dallas v. Saucedo-FallsTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Kaufman County v. Crow, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
- City of Corinth v. NUROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.