Legal Opinion
City of Dallas v. Saucedo-Falls
Texas Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 2007No. 05-0973PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
Several police officers and firefighters sued the City of Dallas alleging that they were entitled to a pay raise. They sued for back pay, interest, and attorney fees, and alternatively for declaratory relief. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE §§ 37.001-011. The City answered and counterclaimed for declaratory relief on the effect of a City resolution, and on the City’s lack of liability thereunder, and for attorney fees and costs. Id. § 37.009. The City later filed a plea to the jurisdiction asserting that plaintiffs had not affirmatively demonstrated a waiver of the City’s governmental immunity…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Reata Construction Corp. v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Texas Education Agency v. LeeperTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Irving v. Inform Construction, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Dallas v. Saucedo-Falls, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
- Lowell v. City of BaytownTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Corinth v. NUROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- City of Corinth v. NUROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- McLane Company, Inc. v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission Sherry Cook, Chief Administrative Officer and Officer for Public Information of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission And Ken Paxton, Attorney General of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.