Legal Opinion

Re Naturalization of Antolin Punsalan Pangilinan, Petitioners v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Re Naturalization of Mario Valderrama Litonjua v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 11, 1986No. 81-5427Published

1Opinion of the Court

796 F.2d 1091

Re Naturalization of Antolin Punsalan PANGILINAN, et al.,

Petitioners- Appellants,

v.

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee.

Re Naturalization of Mario Valderrama LITONJUA, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee.

Nos. 80-4543, 81-5427.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued Aug. 13, 1982.

Submitted March 20, 1985.

Aug. 11, 1986.

Donald L. Ungar, Lawrence N. Di Costanzo, Simmons & Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners-appellants.

Lauri Steven Filppu, John T. Bannon, Jr., Marshall Tamor Golding, Frank O.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API