Legal Opinion

Barco, Inc. and Barco NV v. Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd., and Yealink Network Technology Co., Ltd.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided August 27, 2026No. 2:23-cv-00521Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BARCO, INC. and BARCO NV, § § Plaintiffs, § § v. § CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00521-JRG-RSP § YEALINK (USA) NETWORK § TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and § YEALINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY § CO., LTD., § § Defendants. § § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is the Motion for Permanent Injunction (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiffs Barco Inc. and Barco NV (“Barco”). (Dkt. No. 250.) Having considered the Motion, all related briefing, and the parties’ oral arguments, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED. I.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  3. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Garlock, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. ACUMED LLC v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API