Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Clay

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1972No. 45213-45215PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ON APPELLANTS’ MOTIONS FOR REHEARING

DALLY, Commissioner.

Since our original opinions, which will now be withdrawn, it has been made to appear by certified copies of judgments of conviction that each of the appellants has been tried and convicted. A jury verdict has been returned that each appellant is guilty of the offense of murder and a penalty of ninety-nine years imprisonment has been assessed as to each appellant. The appellants are not now entitled to bail. Article 44.04(h), Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

These appeals have therefore been rendered moot and will be dismissed. Ex parte Morgan,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MorganCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Ex parte De AngeloCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Abney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Ex parte McCallumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Henriksen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Freeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Ex Parte Edward James Waddell, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  5. Henriksen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API