Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1993No. B14-92-00707-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ELLIS, Justice.

Appellant, Earl Clarence Smith, appeals his judgment of conviction for the felony offense of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 31.07 (Vernon 1989). The jury rejected appellants not guilty plea and, after finding the two enhancement paragraphs of the indictment to be true, assessed punishment at ninety-nine (99) years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. We affirm.

Appellant brings eight points of error on his appeal. In his first point of error, appellant asserts that the trial court should have…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. McQueen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Henriksen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Gardner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Bruno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Angela Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  2. Coby Robert Gordy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015
  3. Ex Parte Edward James Waddell, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  4. Ex Parte: Dennis Rogers, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2010
  5. Ex Parte: Dennis Rogers, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API