Legal Opinion

Yarmy v. Semple

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1928Published

1Opinion of the CourtFarr, J.

It will be recalled that the original section was amended in 1925 (111 O.L. 194), and that the paragraph above quoted w,as the subject of the amendment to the original section not carrying such provisions.

It is well settled that a lease' made for a consideration constitutes a sale of an interest in real estate; Brenner v. Speigle, 116 O.S., 631, and the fact that in the instant case the plaintiff asks judgment in the sum of $5,000.00 does not necessarily convert the action into one for quantum meruit as on an implied contract; Hornback, et al. v. Paper Co., O. L. Ab. May 12, 1928, 289, (6…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brenner v. SpiegleOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Seifert v. DirkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hornback v. Sabin Robbins Paper Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Mock v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API