Legal Opinion

Brenner v. Spiegle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1927No. 20303PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The question of substance presented by. this record is whether, under Section 8621 of the General Code, as amended in 1925 (111 Ohio Laws, p. 104), an action to recover commissions based upon the securing of a tenant for the lease of real estate does not lie unless the contract to pay such commission is in writing.

The statute, as amended in 1925, reads, in its material portions, as follows:

“No action shall be brought whereby to charge the defendant, * # * upon an agreement, promise or contract to pay any commission for or upon the sale of an interest in real estate * * * unless the agreement…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chandler v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Minneapolis Iron Store Co. v. BranumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Stensgaard v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Kolb v. J. E. Bennett Land Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Mattingly's v. BrentsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Devore v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  3. Bell v. DimmerlingOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Heritage Hills, Ltd. v. DeaconOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Bretz v. Union Central Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API