Legal Opinion

Pandey v. Paul Revere Life Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 7, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff is appealing from the denial of relief in the county court of two separate petitions brought under G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.). In both petitions, the plaintiff sought reversal of a Superior Court order which allowed the defendants’ motion to vacate default judgments entered against them on October 21, 1993, pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P. 33 (a), as amended, 368 Mass. 906 (1976), for failure to reply promptly to interrogatories.

Relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, is not available to the plaintiff. See Planned Parenthood League of Mass., Inc. v. Operation Rescue, 406 Mass. 701,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Operation RescueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Foley v. Lowell Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Dunbrack v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Pandey v. RoulstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Pandey v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sabree v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional InstitutionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Owens v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API