Legal Opinion

Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 9, 1985No. 331-81TPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON EMPLOYEE TRAINING AND ADVERTISING EXPENSE ISSUES

PHILIP R. MILLER, Judge.

Question Presented

In this suit for refund of federal income taxes paid for the years 1970, 1971, and 1972 the question at issue is whether certain expenditures incident to putting into operation two new electric generating facilities, including a nuclear plant, were capital expenditures, as determined by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, or ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in carrying on plaintiff’s business, as contended by plaintiff (Cleveland Electric or CEI). The expenditures at issue are the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Interstate Transit Lines v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin H. Fishman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Electric Energy, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  3. RJR Nabisco v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
  4. Nelson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API