Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Halverson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from, Buena Vista District Court.— Hon. W. B. Quarton, Judge. Action at law to recover damages doné by defendant’s dog. Trial to a jury. Directed verdict for the defendant, and plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the Court

Dee'Mer, C. J.—

Plaintiff claims that defendant is the owner of a dog which went upon his premises and killed and injured more than 40 head of sheep and lambs. Defendant’s answer is a general denial. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s *126testimony defendant moved for a verdict because there was no evidence to sliow that defendant’s dog killed or injured any of plaintiff’s sheep; because there was no evidence that the dog which did the damage-belonged to the defendant; and for the further reason that, according to the testimony, the sheep were injured nr killed by the joint act and trespass of two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1817
  2. Adams v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1829
  3. Dyer v. HutchinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Wilbur v. HubbardNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Denny v. CorrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nohre v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Stine v. McShaneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Carson v. SabinUtah Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API