Legal Opinion

Denny v. Correll

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1857PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Kosciusko Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit by Correll against James and Martin Demy, to recover the value of sheep killed by the dogs of the defendants. Judgment, for the plaintiff against the defendants jointly. Each of the defendants was the exclusive owner of one of the dogs.

II. C. Newcomb and J. S. Harvey, for the appellant.

The Court instructed the jury that the plaintiff might recover against the defendants jointly. The defendants excepted.

At the common law, those jointly concerned in the commission of a tort, may be sued jointly; and there may be a joint recovery if the tort be one which might have been committed by…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Van Steenburgh v. TobiasNew York Supreme Court · 1837

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nohre v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Anderson v. HalversonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Dole v. HardingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API