Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Hurst

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1990No. 880284PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

Plaintiff Mary Aleñe Hunt appeals the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant Dr. J. Earl Hurst. Plaintiff also appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion for a continuance.

I

Hunt filed a pro se complaint on August 5, 1987. The complaint alleged that Dr. Hurst provided orthodontic treatment for Hunt in 1972 following an accident in which she chipped a lower front tooth. According to the complaint, Dr. Hurst’s orthodontic treatment continued until September 1985. Hunt alleges that Dr. Hurst’s treatment was negligent and caused her serious damage.

Dr.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. CopelandUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Webster v. SillUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Bowen v. Riverton CityUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Jackson v. DabneyUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Strand v. Associated Students of the University of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Carrier v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Menzies v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Sandy City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Dwiggins v. Morgan JewelersUtah Supreme Court · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API