Clayton v. Does
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 STEPHEN JOHN CLAYTON, et al., CASE NO. C23-1324JLR 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 12 DOES, 13 Defendants. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is pro se Plaintiffs Stephen John Clayton and Christopher Stephen 17 Clayton’s (“Plaintiffs”) ex parte “motion for discovery to subpoena third parties without 18 initial disclosure.” (Mot. (Dkt. # 12).) The court has considered the motion, the relevant 19 portions of the record, and the governing law. Being fully advised, the court DENIES 20 Plaintiffs’ motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Omar QaziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- First Commodity Corp. Of Boston and Richard Badoian v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and John RuddyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Malibu Media, LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.