DeBrabant v. Roadway Express, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, P.J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right from a judgment of no cause of action on her claim that she was discriminatorily discharged by defendants from her employment on the basis of marital status, contrary to the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2202(1); MSA 3.548(202X1), which prohibits employment discrimination based on marital status. Sitting without a jury, the trial judge found that plaintiff failed to meet her burden of proving that defendants applied their antinepotism rule to her in a discriminatory manner. We hold that the no-spouse portion of defendant Roadway’s antinepotism rule is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. SnowMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Washington Water Power Co. v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Civil Rights Commission v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Gallaway v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.