Legal Opinion

DeBrabant v. Roadway Express, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1984No. Docket No. 70754Published

1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from a judgment of no cause of action on her claim that she was discriminatorily discharged by defendants from her employment on the basis of marital status, contrary to the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2202(1); MSA 3.548(202X1), which prohibits employment discrimination based on marital status. Sitting without a jury, the trial judge found that plaintiff failed to meet her burden of proving that defendants applied their antinepotism rule to her in a discriminatory manner. We hold that the no-spouse portion of defendant Roadway’s antinepotism rule is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. SnowMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Washington Water Power Co. v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Civil Rights Commission v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Gallaway v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API