Legal Opinion

Jarrett v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 14, 1942No. 10285PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company sued H. K. Jarrett on a note, with interest at 7% from its date. Liability for interest was denied, and a counter-claim was made for damages for breach of a contract that Jarrett should be sole dealer in Macon, Ga., for the products of Pittsburgh, and the damages were asked to be tripled because of a breach of the federal anti-trust laws. A motion to dismiss the counter-claim and one for summary judgment on the other pleadings were decided in favor of Pittsburgh, and Jarrett appeals.

The counter-claim is based on a printed form contract…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pepsi-Cola Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  2. Denison Mattress Factory v. The Spring-Air CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. Body-Steffner Co. v. Flotill Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Sunbeam Corp. v. Payless Drug StoresDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  5. James Cable Partners, L.P. v. City of JamestownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API