Legal Opinion
Lazovitz v. Board of Adjustment
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 28, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
213 N.J. Super. 376 (1986)
517 A.2d 486
STEPHEN LAZOVITZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, BERKELEY HEIGHTS, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 8, 1986.
Decided October 28, 1986.
Before Judges KING, HAVEY and MUIR.
Daniel S. Bernstein argued the cause for appellant (Bernstein, Hoffman & Clark, attorneys; Daniel S. Bernstein and Suzanne T. Bogad on the brief).
J. Alan Drummond argued the cause for respondent (Drummond & Owren, attorneys; J. Alan Drummond on the brief).
2Per curiam
This case comes before us on an expedited basis. Our opinion…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Watt v. Mayor and Council of Borough of FranklinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Kohl v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Fair LawnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Grundlehner v. DanglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Urban Farms, Inc. v. Franklin LakesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Smart SMR of New York, Inc. v. Borough of Fair Lawn Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Sica v. Board of Adjustment of Tp. of WallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Medical Realty v. Bd. of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Children's Inst. v. Verona Tp. Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Elco v. RC Maxwell Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.