Legal Opinion

Foster v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1991No. 57174PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge.

Movant, William Foster, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an eviden-tiary hearing. We affirm.

In September, 1978 movant was convicted by a jury of five counts of robbery in the first degree1 and sentenced under the Prior Offender Act to 130 years in the Department of Corrections. Cause No. 78-1062. This court affirmed that conviction on direct appeal in State v. Foster, 600 S.W.2d 207 (Mo.App.1980).

On June 30, 1988, movant filed a timely pro se motion under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 alleging forty-three counts for post conviction relief. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. State v. VinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  5. State v. StepterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JenningsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Trehan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Boxx v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Burgin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. BrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API