Legal Opinion

Hymas v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 8, 2020No. 20-524Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-524C (Filed: September 8, 2020) NOT FOR PUBLICATION ) JAY HYMAS, ) d/b/a DOSEMAN FARMS, ) Pro Se Plaintiff; 28 U.S.C. § 1500. ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER DISMISSING CASE Pending before the court is the motion to dismiss filed by defendant the United States (“the government”). Def.’s Mot., ECF No. 8. The government argues that pro se plaintiff Jay Hymas’s complaint must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim under Rules 12(b)(1) and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Tohono O’odham NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Brandt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  3. Hymas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Acetris Health, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  5. Ministerio Roca Solida v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API