Illinois National Guard v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:
The Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) held that, under the Federal Employees Federal and Compressed Work Schedules Act of 1982 (Schedules Act), the National Guards of three states must bargain with certain of their full-time employees over the establishment of compressed work schedules. The Guards, joined by the Department of Defense, petition for review, arguing that the National Guard Technician Act (Technician Act) exempts them from the bargaining requirements of the Schedules Act; the FLRA cross-petitions to enforce its orders. We conclude that Congress…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gilligan v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Bulova Watch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Townsend v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Liberty Maritime Corporation v. United States of America Omi Corporation v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Needle v. HoyteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Illinois National Guard v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, National Federation of Federal Employees, Intervenor. Wyoming Air National Guard and Department of Defense v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, California National Guard and Department of Defense v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Liberty Maritime Corporation v. United States of America Omi Corporation v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Winters v. RidleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.