Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 15, 1984No. 05-83-00498-CRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Justice.

Appellant was charged and convicted under the 1981 amended version of section 21.03 of the Texas Penal Code. See Act of April 30, 1981, ch. 96, § 1, 1981 Tex.Gen. Laws 203 and Act of May 25,1981, ch. 202, § 1, 1981 Tex.Gen.Laws 471, repealed by Act of May 27, 1983, ch. 977, § 3, 1983 Tex.Gen.Laws 5315. 1 The offense, however, occurred before the effective date of that statute and while the 1973 version of the statute was in effect. Appellant contends that prosecution under the amended statute constituted an ex post facto application of that law. We agree and consequently…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Rucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Millican v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Seek v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1982
  5. People v. SpainAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Tinker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  2. Aylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Lindsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Dacquisto v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986
  5. Selvog v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API