Legal Opinion

Tinker v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided October 26, 2004No. 14-03-00809-CRPublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

J. HARVEY HUDSON, Justice.

Appellant, Donnie Nathan Tinker, was charged by indictment with two counts of aggravated sexual assault, enhanced by two prior felony convictions. The jury found appellant guilty on the second count and assessed his punishment at sixty (60) years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. In three points of error, appellant contends: (1) the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to support his conviction; (2) the trial court improperly admitted his tape-recorded statement into evidence; and (3) the trial court…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Zuniga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Bargas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  2. McClenton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  3. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Lane v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  5. Jon Paul Proctor v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2011

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API