Legal Opinion

Pinney v. Hill

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1974No. 39304PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

Harold Hill, defendant, appeals from a decree of specific performance requiring him to execute the necessary documents to register eight quarter horse colts and to pay $1,500 damages to Ronald Pinney, plaintiff. We affirm.

Plaintiff had a registered quarter horse stallion under his management and control. Defendant was the owner of 10 registered quarter horse mares. Early in 1969, the parties entered into an oral agreement whereby plaintiff paid defendant $1,000 and the defendant leased the 10 mares to plaintiff for breeding purposes. Plaintiff was to own the colts. The mares produced eight…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kofka v. RosickyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Scripter v. ScripterNebraska Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Biggerstaff v. OstrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of Omaha v. MatthewsNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Marfisi v. SpagnolaNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Spilinek v. SpilinekNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Von Seggern v. Von SeggernNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API