State v. Slifka
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
This is a pretrial appeal by the state pursuant to Rule 29.03, Rules of Criminal Procedure, from an order of the district court suppressing evidence in the prosecution of defendant for unlawful possession of cocaine powder and amphetamine tablets. It is undisputed for purposes of this appeal that defendant abandoned the drugs in the face of a threatened search of his person by law enforcement officers, but the district court held that the abandonment doctrine did not apply because the officers acted illegally in arresting defendant and attempting to search him. We affirm.
Two officers in this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- City of St. Paul v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. FlorineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. OrtegaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. ZuehlkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. DineenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. BrazilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. BigelowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.