Legal Opinion

State v. Christensen

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 16, 1985No. 5963-4-IIIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McInturff, A.C.J.

Paul Christensen appeals his conviction of possession of controlled substances, cocaine and LSD. The primary issue concerns whether Mr. Christensen knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel. We reverse.

At his preliminary appearance September 13, 1982, Mr. Christensen appeared in person and was not represented by counsel. He was advised by both the prosecutor and the court to obtain counsel and the arraignment was postponed for 1 week to give Mr. Christensen an opportunity to reconsider his decision to represent himself and to secure the services of counsel. The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. Welty, John JacobCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HahnWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. VermillionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. State v. VermillionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. State v. VermillionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. State v. HeggeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API