State v. Christensen
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
McInturff, A.C.J.
Paul Christensen appeals his conviction of possession of controlled substances, cocaine and LSD. The primary issue concerns whether Mr. Christensen knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel. We reverse.
At his preliminary appearance September 13, 1982, Mr. Christensen appeared in person and was not represented by counsel. He was advised by both the prosecutor and the court to obtain counsel and the arraignment was postponed for 1 week to give Mr. Christensen an opportunity to reconsider his decision to represent himself and to secure the services of counsel. The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Welty, John JacobCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. HahnWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. VermillionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. VermillionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. VermillionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- State v. HeggeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.