Legal Opinion

Florer v. Sheridan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1894No. 16,371PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDailey, J.

The appellee, as plaintiff in the court below, brought her action against the appellants and Melville W. Miller and George P. Haywood to prevent the collection of certain taxes by appellant, Florer, treasurer of Tippecanoe county.

The original complaint was lost and another substituted; a demuyrer was filed to the substituted complaint, by each defendant, for want of sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action, which was sustained as to defendants, Miller and Haywood, and plaintiff refusing to amend the complaint, judgment was rendered in their favor;

The demurrers of appellants, Florer…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. McCreeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Wasson v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. City of Indianapolis v. VajenIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Matter v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Florer v. SherwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Boehm v. Town of St. JohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Lewis v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State ex rel. Breckenridge v. FlemingNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Board of Commissioners v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Deniston v. TerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API