Legal Opinion

State v. DePompei

Medina Municipal Court

Decided June 25, 2002No. 01 TRC 03542Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dale H. Chase, Judge.

{¶ 1} This matter is before the court on defendant Edward R. DePompei’s motion in limine seeking to prohibit introduction of testimony at trial with regard to standardized field sobriety tests. The defendant argues that based upon State v. Homan (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 421, 732 N.E.2d 952, this court should prohibit admission of standardized field sobriety tests absent strict compliance with standardized testing procedures when these tests are sought to be introduced at trial on the merits.

{¶ 2} This court was awaiting a decision on this identical issue on appeal in State…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. HomanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. State v. PastoriniCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Cann-Hanson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API