Legal Opinion

Ctr. for Investigative Civil Action Reporting v. Se. Pa. Transp. Auth.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-1839Published

1Opinion of the CourtMichael M. Baylson, District Judge

I. Introduction

Plaintiff, The Center for Investigative Reporting ("CIR"), has moved for a preliminary injunction to enjoin Defendant, the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ("SEPTA"), from enforcing two specific advertising standards. CIR sought to purchase advertising space in and on SEPTA buses to display its journalistic comic strip about disparate lending practices. The advertisement was rejected on the basis of SEPTA's standards at issue-specifically, because it constituted a "political" advertisement and expressed a position on a "matter[ ] of public debate."

For the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API