Finney v. Mabry
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
CONSENT DECREE
EISELE, Chief Judge.
The parties, through their respective counsel, have reached an agreement or an accord for resolving the issues in the above captioned lawsuit. They seek the Court’s sanction of that agreement through means of a Consent Decree and judicial approval of the same. Being satisfied that the pro posed Consent Decree will reasonably resolve the issues raised by the parties, the Court hereby gives its tentative approval hereto and enters the following Order and Decree.
I
The individual named petitioner is Robert Finney (hereinafter the “petitioner”). The individual…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Finney v. HuttoDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1976
3Cited by10 opinions
- Goff v. MenkeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kane v. WinnDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Larry Chambers v. Philip KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Jones v. HuttoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.