Legal Opinion

Murray v. Thompson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

PROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County. — W. B. Garvin, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

This is a suit by complainant, a minor, to disaffirm a contract of indorsement of a note of which he was payee, and to recover the note .from Thompson, indor-see.

Complainant while in the employ of a brick company received personal injuries, and the company executed to him a note of $1,750 in satisfaction of his claim to damages. The note was made payable June 1, 1935, which was the. date on which complainant would arrive of age. On October 16, 1914, W. A. Murray, the father of complainant, with the knowledge and authority of the latter, sold the note to Thompson, indorsing the name of the son…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McClain v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Case v. EspenschiedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Roach v. WoodallTennessee Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. Bank of Rockville Center Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. Brumley v. Chattanooga Speedway & Motordrome Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Bancredit, Inc. v. BetheaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Strother v. Lynchburg Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  5. Wright v. the Bank of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API