Legal Opinion

Roach v. Woodall

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. ANDRew Allisoh, Cb.

1Opinion of the Court

Snod&rass, J.

Isaac Whitworth sold to J. B. and William Hartman a tract of land, taking in part consideration therefor the following note, payable to his minor son:

“January 21, 1878.
“ Thirteen years after date we promise to pay to the order of Milton J. Whitworth five hundred dollars, being fourth payment for a tract of land. Yalue received.
“John B. Hartman,
“William Hartman.”

The note subsequently came into the possession of Defendant Woodall, as guardian of the minor payee.

Woodall delivered the note to Defendant W. I. Cherry in 1889, and before it was due, as collateral security for Cherry’s…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jefferson Bank of St. Louis v. Chapman-White-Lyons Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Murray v. ThompsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Neely v. Clarence Saunders Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Whitney v. WhitneyOregon Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API