Legal Opinion

State v. McDonough

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 16, 2009No. Docket: Cum-08-328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

[¶ 1] John McDonough appeals from the restitution order that was entered as part of his conviction for operating after suspension (Class E), 29-A M.R.S. § 2412-A(1-A)(D) (2008) entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Warren, J.) after McDonough pleaded no contest to that charge and to violating conditions of release (Class E), 15 M.R.S. § 1092(1)(A) (2008). McDonough argues that the court erred in ordering him to pay restitution for a conviction of operating after suspension. We vacate the Superior Court’s order requiring McDonough to pay restitution.

[¶ 2] On November 30, 2007,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BeaudoinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  2. State v. HolmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Christopher T. KnightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  2. Brianna Marie Peterson v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2021
  3. State of Maine v. Christopher T. KnightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API