State of Maine v. Christopher T. Knight
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
Majority: MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, and HJELM, JJ.
Dissent: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, J.
HJELM, J.
[¶ 1] This case calls for us to determine whether Maine’s restitution statutes authorize an order of restitution for the benefit of the Maine State Police (MSP) for expenses it incurred when it repaired a woods road it used during a criminal investigation and its aftermath. We conclude that in the circumstances of this case, the MSP is not a statutorily eligible recipient of restitution, and we therefore vacate the order of restitution but affirm the remaining aspects of the judgment of conviction…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- State of Maine v. Thomas BennettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- State v. O'DONNELLSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- State v. BeaudoinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- State v. KotredesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of Maine v. John KendallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Kayla Doherty v. Merck & Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- State of Maine v. Wendy L. GagneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- State v. PalmerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- State of Maine v. Christopher T. KnightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.