Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 2009No. 24805PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Retired Justice.

[¶ 1.] After Kent Jackson failed to complete the installation of a roof on Gary Epperson’s business, the State charged him with grand theft by deception. Jackson moved for judgment of acquittal after the State rested its case-in-chief. The motion was denied. A jury convicted him of the crime, prompting Jackson to again move for a directed verdict, but it was *542denied a second time. Jackson appeals. We reverse.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Jackson embarked upon a roofing career in 1995. His business, based out of Pierre, South Dakota, was a sole proprietorship from 1995 until 2000, when it…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HeftelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. BostonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. MorseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. GonzalezSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. DowningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. KesslerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. KrouseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Lawrence v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. Atwood.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Lawrence v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API