Dupignac v. Bernstrom
New York Supreme Court
Demubbebs to amended complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtClaeke, J.
This suit is brought to have an alleged contract declared binding upon the De Laval Separator Company, a corporation, and upon the Aktiebolaget Separator and the other defendants, stockholders of the said De Laval company. The plaintiff claims that he is entitled to five per cent, of the net ¡earnings of the De Laval company (in addition to any dividends .he may be entitled to as stockholder) as the same may accrue from time to time in excess of current and reasonable future .requirements, terminable only upon the death of the plaintiff, and prays that the defendants be enjoined from doing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Whitney v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Crane v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Peterson v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Oakes v. Cattaraugus Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Cozine v. Graham & BleekerNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shea v. KeeneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Gavazzi v. DryfoosNew York Supreme Court · 1905