Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Chattams v. Pater

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 2012No. 2011-1317PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the request of appellant, D’Anthony Chattams, for immediate injunctive relief stopping the further execution of his prison term, in the context of his mandamus case against appellee, Butler County Court of Common Pleas Judge Charles Pater. Courts of appeals lack original jurisdiction in prohibitory injunction. State ex rel. Esarco v. Youngstown City Council, 116 Ohio St.3d 131, 2007-Ohio-5699, 876 N.E.2d 953, ¶ 11. Moreover, habeas corpus, and not mandamus, is the appropriate action to seek release from prison. State ex rel. Briscoe…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Esarco v. Youngstown City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State ex rel. Briscoe v. MatiaOhio Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Whitehead v. Sandusky County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Thompson v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API