Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Esarco v. Youngstown City Council

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2007No. 2007-1801PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an expedited election action for a writ of mandamus to declare unlawful an ordinance submitting a proposed charter amendment to the electorate, to prohibit the election on the proposed amendment, and to compel a city council and a mayor to create a charter commission to review and recommend charter amendments. Because the real objects sought are a declaratory judgment and prohibitory injunction and relator failed to comply with the personal-knowledge requirement of S.Ct.Prac.R. X(4)(B), we dismiss the cause.

{¶ 2} On September 5, 2007, respondent Youngstown City Council enacted…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Crabtree v. Franklin County Board of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Crabtree v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Essig v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State ex rel. McCord v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. The State Ex Rel. Walker Et Al. v. HustedOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. The STATE EX REL. GADELL-NEWTON v. HUSTED Et Al.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State ex rel. Ohio Stands Up!, Inc. v. DeWine (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State ex rel. McKenney v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API