Toney Schloss Properties Corp. v. Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.
From the chancellor’s finding that appellant’s mortgage was subordinate to a construction .mortgage of the appellee (both secured by the same property), this appeal was taken.
The question involved is whether the appellant’s mortgage, which it subordinated to a construction mortgage given to the appellee, is inferior to such construction mortgage, where, at the time of settlement, the appellee paid the full amount of the loan to the mortgagor, which, in accordance with its agreement to do so, deposited the same in the name of twQ trustees to secure its application .periodically to the making…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Housing Mortgage Corp. v. Allied Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Edelhoff & Rinke v. Horner-Miller Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Neeb v. Atlantic Mill & Lumber Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Rupp, Trustee v. Johnston Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Frank M. Ewing Co. v. Krafft Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hoffman v. Key Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Stater v. Dulany, AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Hoffman v. Key Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Hoffman v. KEY FED. SAV. & L. ASS'N.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Loyola Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975