Legal Opinion
In re Ragland
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 8, 2016No. Case No. 12-50001PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEBTOR’S AMENDED MOTION TO MODIFY CHAPTER 13 PLAN (DOC. NO. 87)
Caldwell, Judge'
On April 8, 2015, Stephen K. Ragland (Debtor) filed a Motion to Modify his Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Plan), and he amended the Motion on July 1, 2015. The Debtor seeks to lower the dividend paid to unsecured creditors from 12% to 0.1%, premised upon an alleged drafting error listing him as “above median income”. As a result, the Debtor is currently obligated to make plan payments for five years, rather than three. The Chapter 13 Trustee (Trustee) objects, arguing that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ana Flores v. Rod DanielsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Bauman v. Post (In Re Post)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
- Salt Creek Valley Bank v. Wellman (In Re Wellman)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- In Re HillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- In re HarkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Simmons v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (In re Simmons)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016