Mangham v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for embezzlement; from Spalding superior court— ' Judge Daniel. February 15, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
1. Mangliam was convicted of tbe offense of embezzlement, as defined by § 186 of the'Penal Code of 1910. His motion for a new trial being overruled, the case is here for review. The record is exceedingly voluminous.. It contains a demurrer to the indictment, based on numerous grounds; and the motion for a new trial, besides the general grounds, contains thirty-five special grounds. The grounds of the demurrer are substantially repeated in the motion for a new trial, and the grounds which we deem of sufficient importance to require special elaboration will be treated *429of without reference to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Cohen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Orr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
3Cited by34 opinions
- People v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- State v. TeutschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Cason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- People v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.