Legal Opinion

Jones v. Barrow

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 7, 2010No. A10A0990PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Judge.

In this personal injury action, Carl Jones sued Homer Barrow and William Scott Murphy, claiming that he was injured as a result of Murphy’s negligence in cutting down a dead tree on Barrow’s property and as a result of Barrow’s failure to keep his property safe from such hazards. Following a grant of summary judgment in favor of Barrow, Jones appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in concluding as a matter of law that he was a licensee, rather than an invitee, and in failing to construe the evidence in his favor. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Summary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCaskill v. CarilloCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Britt v. Kelly & Picerne, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Higginbotham v. WinbornCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Matlack v. Cobb Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Plantation at Lenox Unit Owners' Ass'n v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McGarity v. Hart Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Freeman v. EichholzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. SWOPE v. GREENBRIAR MALL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  4. Benjamin Card v. Dublin Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  5. Milledgeville Manor Partners, LLC v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API