Legal Opinion
Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 20, 2002No. Nos. 01-322C, 01-536CPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
Before the court is defendant’s partial motion to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint. The issues to be decided are whether the implied-contract theory of bid protest jurisdiction survived the 1996 amendments to the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (1994 & Supp. V 1999), and whether plaintiff can recover lost profits on a contract from which it was precluded from bidding due to the wrongful actions of the government agency. Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
The details of this bid protest case have already been published and will not be repeated. See Lion Raisins v. United…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Eco Tour Adventures, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- PHT Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- FFTF Restoration Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.